“Let us work together to replace despair with HOPE, fear with human SECURITY and humiliation with DIGNITY”


How different this Camp David Summit is from the one 22 years ago!

Dear Family and Friends:

How different this Camp David Summit is from the one 22 years ago!

In 1978, even though right up until the very end the peace treaty was in doubt the framework for discussion between President Sadat, Prime Minister Began, and President Carter, was much more conducive than the present reality.  For one thing the Egyptian and Israeli populations were not intertwined so closely as the co-dependent Palestinians and Israelis.  200 kilometers separated the major population centers then, a few hundred meters now.  In some places the neighbors (cousins!) here can see in each others’ windows!  Military barricades facing one another in many places are just across roads.  Lines of fire are being calibrated and fortresses strengthened should the talks fail and hostilities
break out again.

So how must we see this “last ditch” effort for peace here in the troubled Holy Land?  It is definitely a confusing and politically charged and actually frightening time.  Even the fragile Israeli political system, which seems designed to careen from crisis to crisis, sent Prime Minister Barak off with a near “no confidence” slap in the face from the Knesset and resignations of ministers.

Karen is already in Boston and I, due to fly on Friday morning, feel some ambivalence about leaving our staff during this apparently pivotal time. Although chances are that once again discussions, negotiations, and stalling will drag on for some time to come.  Even with President Clinton pushing for a better legacy as his time runs out.

One of our greatest concerns is that these “peace partners” are not really equal.  And time after time since the early 1990s Madrid meetings and the subsequent Oslo Accords the Palestinians have been told by the stronger partner what they had to do.  The results frankly have been tragic.  Hope for justice is only a flicker in the villages and desperate refugee camps of the West Bank and Gaza.

Without further comment I have attached as text to this email a letter which several of us from the Christian NGOs in Jerusalem have sent to publications. As well,  here is the perspective of those in the Israeli “peace movement”, and their suggestions about how to measure success.  These documents might be useful to you as you follow the meager news comments from the Maryland Catoctin Mountains and await prayerfully the outcome with those here at the “battlefront”.   Meanwhile, as a sign of enduring hope,  the staff people of the agencies listed below continue to improve schools, rehabilitate ancient agricultural water systems, build maternal and child clinics, and write and submit funding proposals to bilateral aid donors such as USAID, the World Bank, foundations and churches.

Your interest, solidarity and intercessions are a blessing.


Tom Getman
Box 51399
East Jerusalem, Palestine

fx: 972-2-626-4260



for the “Jerusalem Fund”
World Vision International
800 West Chestnut
Monrovia, California 91016-3198


JULY 2000


As  Christians  working and living in the Holy Land, believing God wills justice and  peace  for  all  of  God’s  children, both Palestinian and Israeli, we feel compelled  to  lift  our  voices in lamentation. The time has come for people of faith  to  declare  that  the Oslo process has tarnished what should be a sacred word,  “peace.”  As  Israel  and  the  PLO conduct negotiations over a permanent status agreement, we present a vision of the things that would make for peace in Palestine/Israel, a vision betrayed by the Oslo “peace” process.

A Vision
Our  hope  as Christians is rooted in the coming of God’s kingdom. Through Jesus Christ,  God  breaks down dividing walls of hostility (Eph. 2:15), incorporating different  peoples  into  a  new creation (Gal. 6:15). It is our vision that the Holy  Land  might  prefigure God’s boundary-breaking kingdom, serving as a place where people who were once enemies might be reconciled with one another and live together in peace. The foundations for such reconciliation and peace are justice and  righteousness  (Isaiah  32:16-17).  God  wills  the  joy of jubilee for His
creatures,  a  jubilee which allows God’s children to live together on the basis of  justice  (Luke  4:16-22, Isaiah 61:1-2, Lev. 25). God delights not in might, but  in justice (Jer. 9:23-24), and calls all to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly  (Micah  6:8).  It  is our hope and prayer that Palestinians and Israelis might  live  together  in  a peace built on the foundations of justice, and that Israel/Palestine  might  truly serve as a light to the nations.  We believe that practical ways can be found for Palestinians and Israelis to share the Holy Land in a just and equitable manner.

Jerusalem,  for  example,  can  and  must  be a shared city, open to all. United Nations resolutions, which guarantee  the  right  of return to Palestinian refugees and call for an Israeli withdrawal  from  the  occupied  territories  in  exchange  for peace, provide a workable  framework  for  a  just  and  lasting  accord.  On such foundations of justice  and  equality  lies  the hope for a peace of reconciliation between the Palestinian and Israeli people.

A Lament
We  lament  that, whether intended or not, the Oslo negotiations have promoted a peace of coercion rather than a peace of reconciliation. We lament that the Oslo “peace”  process  has  proven  an instrument with which Israel has increased its control  over Palestinian people and land. Rather than bringing Palestinians and Israelis  together into a new relationship of justice and equality, the flaws in the  Oslo  accords  have  instead  resulted  in  a  regime  of  separation  best characterized  as  apartheid. Seven years of the “peace” process have reinforced this holy land apartheid through several disturbing trends. These include:

Territorial  Fragmentation, House Demolitions, Land Confiscation, and Settlement
The  peace  process  has  not brought about a jubilee for Palestinians, who have become  increasingly  less  secure  in  their  homes and on their land. The Oslo agreements  have  broken up the occupied territories into a bewildering array of disconnected  cantons. These bantustans of Palestinian autonomy lack territorial contiguity.  We  fear  that  while  the  ongoing  negotiations  might  alter the percentages   of   land  under  Palestinian  control,  the  basic  framework  of territorial  fragmentation  will  remain.  Israel  also seldom grants permits to Palestinians  to  build  homes  on their own land, issuing demolition orders for “illegally”  built  houses:  hundreds  of  Palestinian homes have been destroyed
since the signing of the Oslo accords. House demolitions are accompanied by land confiscation,  which  has  also continued unabated since 1993. In a manner sadly reminiscent  of  King Ahab’s confiscation of Naboth’s vineyard (I Kings 21), the Israeli  military  seizes thousands of acres of land from Palestinians, and then uses  this  land  to  expand  Israeli  settlements  in  the occupied territories (illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention). Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, despite his image as a “peace” leader, has accelerated settlement growth to four
times  its previous level under former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.* These settlements  are being connected by a matrix of by-pass roads whose construction is  being  financed  by  U.S.  Government  aid,  costing American taxpayers $1.2 billion.**   Together, the settlements and the by-pass roads rob Palestinians of their  land,  deprive  farmers  of income and restrict the growth of Palestinian population centers.

Restriction of Freedom of Movement:
Since  1993,  Palestinians  have  found  their  freedom of movement increasingly limited. Palestinian travel between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip is strictly regulated  by  a  permit system. The opening of the much-heralded “safe passage” between  the  West  Bank  and Gaza has not, in fact, resulted in free travel, as thousands  of Palestinians have been denied the necessary permits by the Israeli military  authorities.  Israel’s  control  of  the  land surrounding Palestinian population centers in the West Bank also means that it can imprison Palestinians
within  their  respective  cantons,  trapping Palestinians in their villages and cities  and crippling the Palestinian economy. Such artificial separation of the Palestinian people from one another does not contribute to peace.

Unilateral Actions Against Jerusalem:
The  prophet  Isaiah  envisions  Jerusalem  as a joy, where the sound of weeping shall  be heard no more (65:17-19). Unfortunately, Palestinians of the holy city have  little  cause  for  joy.  For  seven years Israel has imposed a closure on Jerusalem,  requiring  Palestinians  from  the  occupied  territories  to obtain permits  to  visit  the  city.  The Israeli closure of Jerusalem denies the vast majority of Palestinians access to Christian and Muslim holy places and prevents access  to Jerusalem’s medical, cultural, and academic institutions. Palestinian
Jerusalemites  are  continually  uncertain  of  their right of residence, as the Israeli  Ministry  of  the  Interior  threatens to strip them of their Jerusalem identity cards if they cannot prove their “center of life” is in the city. Thus, thousands of Palestinians can no longer reside in the city of their birth. While a  shared  Jerusalem  might  become a beacon of reconciliation for humanity, the Jerusalem  shaped  by  the  Oslo  process  has  become  one of the most poignant examples of Palestinian alienation from their heritage and their holy places.

The millions of Palestinian refugees living in Palestine/Israel, the Middle East and  beyond  carry  the burden of dispossession in their bodies and souls. While all Jews eligible under Israel’s Law of  Return  can move to Israel or the occupied territories, Palestinian refugees remain  in  exile,  denied  their  internationally affirmed rights of return and compensation.  Any  agreement  between  Palestinian  and  Israeli which does not uphold the Palestinian right of return will be ephemeral and short-lived.

Within weeks or months, Palestinian and Israeli negotiators might well sign some form  of  agreement. Perhaps it will be a permanent status agreement, addressing all  of  the outstanding issues, including borders, water, settlements, refugees and Jerusalem. Or perhaps it will be a partial agreement, deferring some issues, like  refugees  and  Jerusalem, to a later date. Or perhaps no agreement will be reached,  and the present intolerable situation will drag on. Regardless of what transpires,   we   affirm   that   justice   is  the  foundation  of  peace  and reconciliation.  As  the  international  media  and  world powers clamor “peace, peace”  when  there  is  no  peace, we invite Christians worldwide to join us in praying  and speaking out for a peace built on reconciliation, not coercion. May this  land called “holy” yet provide Palestinian and Israeli with a foretaste of God’s kingdom here on earth.

Signed by
Sonia and Alain Epp Weaver, Mennonite Central Committee
Doug Dicks, Presbyterian Church (USA)
Thomas Getman, World Vision ? Jerusalem
Sandra Olewine, United Methodist Liaison, General Board of Global Ministries
Alex Awad, East Jerusalem Baptist Church
Craig Kippels, Lutheran World Federation

*Figures from Peace Now, cited in World Vision-Jerusalem/World Vision UK report,
“Running on Rhetoric: The Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process and its
Socio-Economic Impact” May/June 2000 Update.
**Wye River aid package, providing Israel with $1.2 billion, $400 million to the
Palestinian Authority, and $300 million to Jordan, passed by the U.S. House of
Representatives, November 5 1999.


TO HOPE OR NOT TO HOPE – The Other Israel briefing nr 17
Tel-Aviv, 11-7-2000

Has it really come? Are we now living that mythical Moment of Truth – so many times predicted and  endlessly speculated about? The moment when a meandering, long-overdue, interminable Peace Process should at last produce a bit of real peace – or break down altogether in an explosion of violence and bloodshed and hatred.

Twenty-two years ago, at the conclusion of that other summit in Camp David, then Israeli  Prime Minister Menachem Begin signed, in the context of an Egyptian-Israeli peace agreement, a document recognizing “The Legitimate Rights of the Palestinian People” – only to immediately drown that obligation in war and massacre.

Later, the Rabin-Arafat handshake on the White House Lawn created the illusion that peace was coming at last – a feeling which was steadily eroded in seven years of unmet deadlines,  ongoing land confiscation, terrorist outbursts, settlement expansion, and ongoing daily oppression.

The Palestinians now seem resolved to gain their independence with or without Israeli consent, ready to make ghastly sacrifices in order to shatter the chains which still bind them. Few of them still believe in the power of peaceful negotiations to set them free. And also among Israelis cynicism is on the rise.

Ehud Barak went to meet Arafat and Clinton at a “last-chance summit” at Camp David: a battered Prime Minister, deserted by most of the parties and factions of his coalition, fighting a parliamentary battle to keep the remnants of his cabinet afloat – and still forging ahead unperturbed, supremely confident (or so he appears) of his ability to bypass the hidebound political system, appeal directly to the people and get their support in elections or referendum on the agreement he would make. But of course, first he would have to make an agreement…

We were waiting  for him last night, hundreds of activists in the peace vigil outside the gates of Ben-Gurion Airport: some grey-haired veterans of many actions rubbing shoulders with the Peace Now Youths, Blue-Shirts and the Peace Drummers with their hypnotic rhythms. The slogan “The majority supports peace” on the brand new T-shirts  was supplemented with stickers such as Gush Shalom’s “There is no such thing as a legal settlement”; young throats chanted energetically for hours on end the good old “No more war” and “Peace Yes – Occupation No!” and “Israel and Palestine – two states for two peoples” and “Don’t want to die in vain – make peace now!” – as well as new ones: “Summit today – Tomorrow Peace” (which rhymes nicely in Hebrew), and “Ehud, bring us peace!”, and “Ehud will bring us peace!”.

Is Prime Minister Ehud Barak going to fulfil the high hopes placed in him by the young – due, all too soon, to be conscripted – or is he going to Camp David only to propose impossible terms; put blame for the failure on “Palestinian intransigence” and call upon the youths to follow him into the coming war? Barak’s starting positions, as repeatedly reiterated in his Five No’s (“The Red Lines”) certainly seem far short of the minimal Palestinian aspirations. True, the PM does seem willing to relinquish about 90% of the West Bank, more than offered by previous governments, or even by himself a year ago. But the “settlement blocks” which Barak still insists upon keeping were established in strategic locations, so as to cut up the West Bank and break the Palestinians’ territorial continuity. Thus, even gaining 90% of the West Bank (itself no more than about 20% of historic Palestine, the rest having become part of Israel already in 1948) a Palestinian state might turn out to be non-viable, a collection of isolated enclaves. Adding to this Barak’s declared intransigence on the sensitive and emotive issues of Jerusalem (“Eternal Capital of Israel, Forever”), and the Palestinian refugees (“No recognition of any Israeli political or judicial responsibility”), it is easy to understand the widespread pessimism about the outcome of Camp David II, or the refusal of many activists to join yesterday’s action at the airport, or the bigger demonstrations in the same vein planned in Jerusalem and Tel-Aviv.

Yet exactly because of his weakened position, Barak may be desperately in need of  ending the summit with an agreement which he can present to the people. Indeed, his political survival largely depends upon it. While Palestinians are willing, if need be, to fight for their freedom, Israelis are far from enthusiastic about a war to keep territory under occupation – as the story of Israel’s involvement in South Lebanon clearly demonstrates. Such a war after failure to cut a deal with Arafat would cost Barak his re-election.

Should Camp David II end, after all, with an Israeli-Palestinian agreement, a clear measure is available for evaluating it: how many of the recent campaigns by Israeli peace and human rights organizations will be obviated by it?

Will there still be a need to protest against house demolitions?

* Weekly vigils were held outside the residence of Nathan Sharansky, until this week Interior Minister of Israel – who was personally responsible for the demolition of several “illegal” Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem. A true peace agreement would completely place such Palestinian homes beyond the reach of the Israeli authorities.

Will there still be a question of unequal division of water resources?

* Be’tselem is in the midst of a campaign to draw attention to the extremely unequal division of the West Bank water sources – with the bulk
going to Israeli settlers, who maintain wide lawns and swimming pools, while the Palestinian inhabitants get a bare 21% of the water. Many of us participated in the demonstration held two weeks ago at the Palestinian town of Yatta, whose inhabitants get water in their taps for only two or three days in a month.  An agreement which fails to give the Palestinians control over the water sources under their own land, as clearly laid down in international law, can by no stretch of the imagination be described as being “peace”.

Will there still be a question of land confiscation in occupied areas?

* A coalition has been building up to oppose the government’s plan to create a “by-pass road” connecting the Israeli settlements of Ofra and Beit El in the Ramallah District of the West Bank – a plan involving widespread confiscation of Palestinian land, the demolition of several Palestinian homes, and the ecological destruction of an uniquely beautiful valley. At least for the inhabitants of this region, a peace which leaves these two settlements as armed Israeli enclaves, still to be connected by a destructive road, will hardly be worth the name.

As the summit in Camp David opens, Israeli and Palestinian forces all over the West Bank and Gaza Strip are establishing lines of
fortifications opposite each other and measuring angles of fire. On the eve of the summit, jittery and trigger-happy soldiers protecting the settlement of Kfar Darom – an enclave bisecting the Gaza Strip’s main highway – shot wildly at a passing Palestinian taxi, killing the 33-year old Aatidal Muamar and severely wounding her husband and her eight-month old child. Will history record her name as the last tragic victim of a century-old conflict – or will many new names of Palestinians and Israelis now still breathing follow hers?

Adam Keller
Beate Zilversmidt

The Other Israel is the newsletter of the
Israeli Council for Israeli-Palestinian Peace
pob 2542, Holon 58125, Israel – ph/fx: +972-3-5565804;
Subscribe/unsubscribe requests to otherisr@actcom.co.il

NB: Did you already take part in the “Map of Peace, Map of …” competition at:

Visit our regularly updated Hebrew/English website:
https://www.gush-shalom.org/ and download the Boycott List of Products of
Settlements, or ask for it by email.
If you want to support our activities you can send a check to:
pob 3322, Tel-Aviv 61033 or, with credit card, click:
NB: Please, email us that you did so!

If you do (not) want our action alerts and updates (un)subscribe to:

2016-10-24T07:36:08+00:00 July 18th, 2000|Categories: News|